You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010328.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohammad R Rasouli, Vafa Rahimi‐Movaghar, Farhad Shokraneh, Maziar Moradi‐Lakeh, Roger Chou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 411 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 12% |
| Researcher | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 77 | 18% |
| Unknown | 121 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 155 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 49 | 12% |
| Unknown | 140 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,815,832
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,156
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,795
of 250,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.