You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
Missing patients in a regional trauma registry: Incidence and predictors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Injury, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.026 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dominique C. Olthof, Rolf W. Peters, M. Klooster, J. Carel Goslings |
Abstract |
Trauma systems have data registries in order to describe and evaluate (the quality of) trauma care. If results between centres and countries (benchmarking) are to be compared, data has to be accurate, reliable and complete. All trauma registries deal with incompleteness. A contributor to incompleteness of the data is failure to include patients that fulfil the criteria; the so-called missing patients. The aim of this study is to assess the number of missing patients in our regional trauma registry and to identify predictors for being missing from the trauma registry. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 21% |
Researcher | 5 | 21% |
Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 67% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |