You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Parental Tdap Boosters and Infant Pertussis: A Case-Control Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pediatrics, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1542/peds.2014-1105 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Helen E Quinn, Thomas L Snelling, Andrew Habig, Clayton Chiu, Paula J Spokes, Peter B McIntyre |
Abstract |
Although recommended for almost a decade, evidence for field effectiveness of vaccinating close adult contacts of newborn infants against pertussis ("cocooning") is lacking. We evaluated the impact of a government-funded cocoon program during a pertussis epidemic in New South Wales, Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 43% |
Spain | 2 | 10% |
Australia | 2 | 10% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Hungary | 1 | 5% |
Armenia | 1 | 5% |
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 90 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 19% |
Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#915,322
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#3,005
of 18,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,796
of 259,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#49
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.