| Title |
Factors limiting and facilitating changes in caring for the intensive care unit patients' relatives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nursing in Critical Care, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nicc.12095 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Concha Zaforteza, Ana García‐Mozo, Sylvia M Amorós, Eva Pérez, Mónica Maqueda, Joaquina Delgado |
| Abstract |
To explore how the intensive care unit (ICU) context influenced receptivity to change in clinical practice, in order to improve the care offered to patients' relatives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 40 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,471,557
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Nursing in Critical Care
#208
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,159
of 232,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nursing in Critical Care
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them