You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Teaching the Computer to Code Frames in News: Comparing Two Supervised Machine Learning Approaches to Frame Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Communication Methods and Measures, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1080/19312458.2014.937527 |
| Authors |
Björn Burscher, Daan Odijk, Rens Vliegenthart, Maarten de Rijke, Claes H. de Vreese |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 69 | 48% |
| Computer Science | 24 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Communication Methods and Measures
#166
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,223
of 251,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communication Methods and Measures
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.