You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Europe Needs a Central, Transparent, and Evidence-Based Approval Process for Behavioural Prevention Interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS Medicine, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001740 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabrizio Faggiano, Elias Allara, Fabrizia Giannotta, Roberta Molinar, Harry Sumnall, Reinout Wiers, Susan Michie, Linda Collins, Patricia Conrod |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Egypt | 1 | 4% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 39% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 25% |
| Psychology | 10 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,170,920
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#2,544
of 5,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,830
of 271,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#41
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.