You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The principles of goal-directed decision-making: from neural mechanisms to computation and robotics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2013.0470 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Pezzulo, Paul F. M. J. Verschure, Christian Balkenius, Cyriel M. A. Pennartz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 23% |
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 37 | 20% |
| Psychology | 34 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 12% |
| Engineering | 19 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,274,811
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,558
of 7,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,232
of 276,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#32
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.