You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
Validation of prediction models based on lasso regression with multiply imputed data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-116 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jammbe Z Musoro, Aeilko H Zwinderman, Milo A Puhan, Gerben ter Riet, Ronald B Geskus |
Abstract |
In prognostic studies, the lasso technique is attractive since it improves the quality of predictions by shrinking regression coefficients, compared to predictions based on a model fitted via unpenalized maximum likelihood. Since some coefficients are set to zero, parsimony is achieved as well. It is unclear whether the performance of a model fitted using the lasso still shows some optimism. Bootstrap methods have been advocated to quantify optimism and generalize model performance to new subjects. It is unclear how resampling should be performed in the presence of multiply imputed data. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 29% |
Researcher | 16 | 13% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 15% |
Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Mathematics | 7 | 6% |
Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Other | 35 | 28% |
Unknown | 31 | 25% |