↓ Skip to main content

Supportive care for women with recurrent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences

Overview of attention for article published in Human Reproduction, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supportive care for women with recurrent miscarriage: a survey to quantify women's preferences
Published in
Human Reproduction, December 2012
DOI 10.1093/humrep/des374
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.M. Musters, Y.E.M. Koot, N.M. van den Boogaard, E. Kaaijk, N.S. Macklon, F. van der Veen, P.T. Nieuwkerk, M. Goddijn

Abstract

Supportive care is regularly offered to women with recurrent miscarriages (RMs). Their preferences for supportive care in their next pregnancy have been identified by qualitative research. The aim of this study was to quantify these supportive care preferences and identify women's characteristics that are associated with a higher or lower need for supportive care in women with RM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 99 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 34%
Psychology 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,981
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction
#2,913
of 6,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,746
of 286,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction
#31
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.