You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Executive summary: HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Europace, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/europace/eut272 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia G. Priori, Arthur A. Wilde, Minoru Horie, Yongkeun Cho, Elijah R. Behr, Charles Berul, Nico Blom, Josep Brugada, Chern-En Chiang, Heikki Huikuri, Kannankeril, Andrew Krahn, Antoine Leenhardt, Arthur Moss, Peter J. Schwartz, Wataru Shimizu, Gordon Tomaselli, Cynthia Tracy, Michael Ackerman, Bernard Belhassen, N. A. Mark Estes, Diane Fatkin, Jonathan Kalman, Elizabeth Kaufman, Paulus Kirchhof, Eric Schulze-Bahr, Christian Wolpert, Jitendra Vohra, Marwan Refaat, Susan P. Etheridge, Robert M. Campbell, Edward T. Martin, Swee Chye Quek |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 21% |
| Unknown | 46 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 50 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,942,314
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Europace
#666
of 3,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,810
of 216,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Europace
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.