↓ Skip to main content

Monocarboxylate Transporter 1 Deficiency and Ketone Utilization

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monocarboxylate Transporter 1 Deficiency and Ketone Utilization
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2014
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1407778
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter M van Hasselt, Sacha Ferdinandusse, Glen R Monroe, Jos P N Ruiter, Marjolein Turkenburg, Maartje J Geerlings, Karen Duran, Magdalena Harakalova, Bert van der Zwaag, Ardeshir A Monavari, Ilyas Okur, Mark J Sharrard, Maureen Cleary, Nuala O'Connell, Valerie Walker, M Estela Rubio-Gozalbo, Maaike C de Vries, Gepke Visser, Roderick H J Houwen, Jasper J van der Smagt, Nanda M Verhoeven-Duif, Ronald J A Wanders, Gijs van Haaften

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 123 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Other 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,397,390
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#16,703
of 32,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,567
of 271,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#212
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.