You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improved Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Use of Automated External Defibrillators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.114.010905 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marieke T Blom, Stefanie G Beesems, Petronella C M Homma, Jolande A Zijlstra, Michiel Hulleman, Daniel A van Hoeijen, Abdennasser Bardai, Jan G P Tijssen, Hanno L Tan, Rudolph W Koster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 16% |
| Canada | 9 | 14% |
| Spain | 7 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Grenada | 1 | 2% |
| Jersey | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 14% |
| Scientists | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 255 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 12% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 54 | 21% |
| Unknown | 64 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 10% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 78 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#749,739
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#1,920
of 21,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,153
of 373,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#17
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.