↓ Skip to main content

Statistical description of the denatured structure of a single protein, staphylococcal nuclease, by FRET analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical description of the denatured structure of a single protein, staphylococcal nuclease, by FRET analysis
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12551-017-0334-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariko Yamaguchi, Emi Ohta, Takuya Muto, Takayoshi Watanabe, Takahiro Hohsaka, Yoichi Yamazaki, Hironari Kamikubo, Mikio Kataoka

Abstract

Structural characterization of fully unfolded proteins is essential for understanding not only protein-folding mechanisms, but also the structures of intrinsically disordered proteins. Because an unfolded protein can assume all possible conformations, statistical descriptions of its structure are most appropriate. For this purpose, we applied Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis to fully unfolded staphylococcal nuclease. Artificial amino acids labeled with a FRET donor or acceptor were introduced by an amber codon and a four-base codon respectively. Eight double-labeled proteins were prepared, purified, and subjected to FRET analysis in 6 M urea. The observed behavior could be explained by a power law, R = αN 0.44, where R, and N are the distance and the number of residues between donor and acceptor, and α is a coefficient. The index was smaller than the value expected for an excluded-volume random coil, 0.588, indicating that the fully unfolded proteins were more compact than polypeptides in good solvent. The FRET efficiency in the native state did not necessarily correlate to the distance obtained from crystal structure, suggesting that other factors such as the orientation factor made a substantial contribution to FRET.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 38%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 38%
Engineering 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,452,930
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#704
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#373,016
of 438,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#30
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.