↓ Skip to main content

Can Focused Trauma Education Initiatives Reduce Mortality or Improve Resource Utilization in a Low‐Resource Setting?

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can Focused Trauma Education Initiatives Reduce Mortality or Improve Resource Utilization in a Low‐Resource Setting?
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00268-014-2899-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin T. Petroze, Jean Claude Byiringiro, Georges Ntakiyiruta, Susan M. Briggs, Dan L. Deckelbaum, Tarek Razek, Robert Riviello, Patrick Kyamanywa, Jennifer Reid, Robert G. Sawyer, J. Forrest Calland

Abstract

Over 90 % of injury deaths occur in low-income countries. Evaluating the impact of focused trauma courses in these settings is challenging. We hypothesized that implementation of a focused trauma education initiative in a low-income country would result in measurable differences in injury-related outcomes and resource utilization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 46 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,044,793
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#630
of 4,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,258
of 361,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#11
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.