↓ Skip to main content

Peer Rejection Cues Induce Cardiac Slowing After Transition Into Adolescence

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Psychology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peer Rejection Cues Induce Cardiac Slowing After Transition Into Adolescence
Published in
Developmental Psychology, March 2014
DOI 10.1037/a0033842
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bregtje Gunther Moor, Marieke G. N. Bos, Eveline A. Crone, Maurits W. van der Molen

Abstract

The present study examined developmental and gender differences in sensitivity to peer rejection across the transition into adolescence by examining beat-by-beat heart rate responses. Children between the ages of 8 and 14 years were presented with unfamiliar faces of age-matched peers and were asked to predict whether they would be liked by the other person. Their prediction was followed by feedback indicating that the peer had accepted or rejected them. Results revealed cardiac slowing to unexpected peer rejection in 11- to 14-year-olds. The cardiac response to unexpected rejection was most pronounced in girls. This pattern of findings supports the hypothesis of an increase in sensitivity to peer rejection after transition into adolescence and indicates that social rejection may be particularly salient in adolescent girls.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 29%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 61%
Sports and Recreations 4 7%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Psychology
#2,575
of 4,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,032
of 236,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Psychology
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.