You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prediction error demarcates the transition from retrieval, to reconsolidation, to new learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Learning & Memory, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1101/lm.035493.114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dieuwke Sevenster, Tom Beckers, Merel Kindt |
| Abstract |
Although disrupting reconsolidation is promising in targeting emotional memories, the conditions under which memory becomes labile are still unclear. The current study showed that post-retrieval changes in expectancy as an index for prediction error may serve as a read-out for the underlying processes engaged by memory reactivation. Minor environmental changes define whether retrieval induces memory reconsolidation or the initiation of a new memory trace even before fear extinction can be observed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 16% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 79 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 45 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Memory
#869
of 1,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,144
of 268,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Memory
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.