↓ Skip to main content

Identification of key genes fluctuated induced by avian leukemia virus (ALV-J) infection in chicken cells

Overview of attention for article published in In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of key genes fluctuated induced by avian leukemia virus (ALV-J) infection in chicken cells
Published in
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11626-017-0198-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guohong Chen, Zhiteng Li, Shuai Su, Guobin Chang, Lingling Qiu, Pengfei Zhu, Yang Zhang, Qi Xu

Abstract

Avian leukemia subgroup J (ALV-J) is one of the most detrimental neoplastic diseases in poultry production. However, the differences between somatic cells and immune cells post-infection remain poorly understood. The aim of our study was to detect the different responses in chicken to infection with ALV-J in different cell lines. In this study, we detected transcriptome expression changes during infection with ALV-J in chicken embryo fibroblast (CEF) and HD11 cell lines. RNA-Seq was used to determine the expression levels of mRNA transcripts from the two cell types after infection with ALV-J at 1, 4, and 7 dpi, and gene ontology analyses were used to cluster differentially expressed genes into pathways. Quantitative real-time PCR confirmed the expression of 336 and 269 differentially expressed genes in CEF and HD11 lines, respectively, involved in innate immunity (OASL, CCL4), adaptive immunity (LYZ, CD72), apoptosis and autophagy (WISP2, COMP), inflammation (JSC, IL8), and tumorgenesis (PCNA, GPX3). The notable signal transduction pathways included the PPARs signaling pathway and ECM-receptor interactions in CEF, and the Toll-like receptor, NOD-like receptor, and RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathways in HD11. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use high-throughput sequencing methods to investigate viral infection in different cell types. The results of the present study form a foundation for developing potential biological markers for viral infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,453,782
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
#670
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#373,036
of 437,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.