↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma on Human Nasal and Bronchial Epithelial Gene Expression

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Impact of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma on Human Nasal and Bronchial Epithelial Gene Expression
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0080257
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariane H. Wagener, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Silvia Luiten, Wytske J. Fokkens, Elisabeth H. Bel, Peter J. Sterk, Cornelis M. van Drunen

Abstract

The link between upper and lower airways in patients with both asthma and allergic rhinitis is still poorly understood. As the biological complexity of these disorders can be captured by gene expression profiling we hypothesized that the clinical expression of rhinitis and/or asthma is related to differential gene expression between upper and lower airways epithelium.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,207,938
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#116,270
of 194,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,863
of 304,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,934
of 5,208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.