↓ Skip to main content

Multifactorial Intervention to Reduce Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multifactorial Intervention to Reduce Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11892-009-0084-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Swapnil N. Rajpathak, Vikas Aggarwal, Frank B. Hu

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes is associated with a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Although several clinical trials have evaluated the effects of interventions to reduce CVD risk in people with diabetes, such studies are primarily conducted to target individual risk factors such as hypertension, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia rather than using a multifactorial interventional approach. Existing clinical trial data suggest that intensive multifactorial interventions that target several important risk factors simultaneously result in a significantly greater risk reduction in CVD risk compared with single risk factor interventions. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy and effectiveness of such interventions on CVD hard end points. A multidisciplinary team management of diabetes should focus on weight control, diet, physical activity, diabetes education, and adherence to pharmacotherapy. An individually tailored aggressive management program to reduce multiple CVD risk factors simultaneously has great potential to prevent CVD morbidity and mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Master 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,571,801
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#601
of 1,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,388
of 167,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.