↓ Skip to main content

Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
7647 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10152 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Published in
Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.1259855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Will Steffen, Katherine Richardson, Johan Rockström, Sarah E Cornell, Ingo Fetzer, Elena M Bennett, Reinette Biggs, Stephen R Carpenter, Wim de Vries, Cynthia A de Wit, Carl Folke, Dieter Gerten, Jens Heinke, Georgina M Mace, Linn M Persson, Veerabhadran Ramanathan, Belinda Reyers, Sverker Sörlin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,026 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10,152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 23 <1%
Sweden 13 <1%
United States 12 <1%
France 8 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
Canada 7 <1%
Switzerland 6 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Brazil 6 <1%
Other 54 <1%
Unknown 10009 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1709 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1439 14%
Researcher 1247 12%
Student > Bachelor 1143 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 438 4%
Other 1319 13%
Unknown 2857 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2038 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1180 12%
Social Sciences 618 6%
Engineering 537 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 411 4%
Other 1986 20%
Unknown 3382 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3889. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,318
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Science
#77
of 83,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 379,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#2
of 1,118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.