↓ Skip to main content

Identifying potentially common genes between dyslipidemia and osteoporosis using novel analytical approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying potentially common genes between dyslipidemia and osteoporosis using novel analytical approaches
Published in
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00438-017-1414-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xu Lin, Cheng Peng, Jonathan Greenbaum, Zhang-Fang Li, Ke-Hao Wu, Zeng-Xin Ao, Tong Zhang, Jie Shen, Hong-Wen Deng

Abstract

Dyslipidemia (DL) is closely related to osteoporosis (OP), while the exact common genetic mechanisms are still largely unknown. We proposed to use novel genetic analysis methods with pleiotropic information to identify potentially novel and/or common genes for the potential shared pathogenesis associated with OP and/or DL. We assessed the pleiotropy between plasma lipid (PL) and femoral neck bone mineral density (FNK BMD). We jointly applied the conditional false discovery rate (cFDR) method and the genetic analysis incorporating pleiotropy and annotation (GPA) method to the summary statistics provided by genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of FNK BMD (n = 49,988) and PL (n = 188,577) to identify potentially novel and/or common genes for BMD/PL. We found strong pleiotropic enrichment between PL and FNK BMD. Two hundred and forty-five PL SNPs were identified as potentially novel SNPs by cFDR and GPA. The corresponding genes were enriched in gene ontology (GO) terms "phospholipid homeostasis" and "chylomicron remnant clearance". Three SNPs (rs2178950, rs9939318, and rs9368716) might be the pleiotropic ones and the corresponding genes NLRC5 (rs2178950) and TRPS1 (rs9939318) were involved in NF-κB signaling pathway and Wnt signaling pathway as well as inflammation and innate immune processes. Our study validated the pleiotropy between PL and FNK BMD, and corroborated the reliability and high-efficiency of cFDR and GPA methods in further analyses of existing GWASs with summary statistics. We identified potentially common and/or novel genes for PL and/or FNK BMD, which may provide new insight and direction for further research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#3,137
of 3,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#390,931
of 450,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.