You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Azolla: A review of its biology and utilization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Botanical Review, January 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02857915 |
| Authors |
Gregory M. Wagner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 18% |
| Researcher | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 17% |
| Unknown | 63 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 98 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,289,220
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Botanical Review
#11
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,682
of 94,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Botanical Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them