↓ Skip to main content

Combining Ibrutinib with Chk1 Inhibitors Synergistically Targets Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cell Lines

Overview of attention for article published in Targeted Oncology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining Ibrutinib with Chk1 Inhibitors Synergistically Targets Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cell Lines
Published in
Targeted Oncology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11523-018-0553-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valentina Restelli, Monica Lupi, Micaela Vagni, Rosaria Chilà, Francesco Bertoni, Giovanna Damia, Laura Carrassa

Abstract

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B cell lymphoma with an unfavorable clinical course. Besides deregulation of the cell cycle, B cell receptor (BCR) signaling, essential for MCL proliferation and survival, is also often deregulated due to constitutive activation of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK). The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has been approved as a therapy for refractory MCL, and while it shows some clinical activity, patients frequently develop primary or secondary ibrutinib resistance and have very poor outcomes after relapsing following ibrutinib treatment. To overcome ibrutinib resistance, new therapeutic approaches are needed. As checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibitors have recently been shown to be effective as single agents in MCL, we assessed the combination of ibrutinib with Chk1 inhibitors. We examined the activity of ibrutinib combined with the Chk1 inhibitor PF-00477736 in eight MCL cell lines and analyzed underlying cellular and molecular effects. The combination was synergistic in all tested cell lines through different mechanisms. The treatment induced apoptosis in ibrutinib-sensitive cell lines, while in ibrutinib-resistant cells the effect was mainly cytostatic and occurred at micromolar concentrations of ibrutinib. The pharmacological approach of simultaneously targeting cell cycle checkpoints (by Chk1 inhibitors) and pro-survival pathways (by ibrutinib) might offer a promising new therapeutic strategy for MCL patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,587,406
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Targeted Oncology
#395
of 555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,984
of 446,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Targeted Oncology
#15
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 555 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.