↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative morphology and synaptology of cerebellar glomeruli in the rat

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, October 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative morphology and synaptology of cerebellar glomeruli in the rat
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, October 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00305102
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. L. Jakab, J. Hámori

Abstract

Computer-assisted stereological and quantitative morphological approaches were used to analyse cerebellar glomeruli of the "simple type" in serial ultrathin sections. It was found that, of the total volume (110-200 micron3) of the glomeruli studied, 53% was occupied by granule cell dendrites, 34% by mossy terminal and 13% by Golgi axons. None of the four analysed glomeruli contained Golgi cell dendrites. The mossy terminals that were studied received, on the average, 53 granule cell dendrites. All of the dendrites originated from different granule cells and all made synaptic contacts with mossy terminal. However only about 60% of granule cell dendrites made synapses with Golgi axons. The surface of the mossy terminals occupied by synaptic junctions, was found to be 5.4-5.5%. Each granule cell dendrite emitted 3-5 terminal protrusions ("dendritic digits"). Each digit receives one or more synaptic contact from either the mossy terminal (67% of all digits), or from Golgi axon varicosities (25%). Only about 8% of all digits were contacted synaptically by both types of axonal terminals. All of the dendritic digits that were observed made synaptic connections. Each digit was, on the average, connected by symmetric attachment plaques to 4 neighbouring digits. Three-dimensional reconstructions of mossy terminal and some of contacting granule cell dendrites demonstrated that the dendrites curved around the central mossy terminal and were much longer than expected from earlier Golgi-impregnation studies. In addition to mossy terminals and Golgi axons, an axon terminal of small calibre that contained large, empty, spheroid vesicles were occasionally observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 3 4%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 70 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 31%
Researcher 20 26%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 40%
Neuroscience 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#675
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,783
of 12,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them