↓ Skip to main content

A Critical Review of Four Efforts to Resurrect MNI in Zooarchaeology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Critical Review of Four Efforts to Resurrect MNI in Zooarchaeology
Published in
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10816-018-9365-3
Authors

R. Lee Lyman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 15 29%
Social Sciences 14 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#21,376,027
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#328
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,185
of 446,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.