You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-immunologic allograft loss in pediatric kidney transplant recipients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Nephrology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00467-018-3908-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isa F. Ashoor, Vikas R. Dharnidharka |
| Abstract |
Non-immunologic risk factors are a major obstacle to realizing long-term improvements in kidney allograft survival. A standardized approach to assess donor quality has recently been introduced with the new kidney allocation system in the USA. Delayed graft function and surgical complications are important risk factors for both short- and long-term graft loss. Disease recurrence in the allograft remains a major cause of graft loss in those who fail to respond to therapy. Complications of over immunosuppression including opportunistic infections and malignancy continue to limit graft survival. Alternative immunosuppression strategies are under investigation to limit calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. Finally, recent studies have confirmed long-standing observations of the significant negative impact of a high-risk age window in late adolescence and young adulthood on long-term allograft survival. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,535,900
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#870
of 3,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,393
of 330,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#20
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,591 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.