↓ Skip to main content

Wax synthase MhWS2 from Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus: substrate specificity and biotechnological potential for wax ester production

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wax synthase MhWS2 from Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus: substrate specificity and biotechnological potential for wax ester production
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-8878-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magdalena Miklaszewska, Franziska Dittrich-Domergue, Antoni Banaś, Frédéric Domergue

Abstract

Wax synthases are involved in the biosynthesis of wax esters, lipids with great industrial potential. Here, we heterologously expressed the native wax synthase MhWS2 from Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and performed comprehensive analysis of its substrate specificity. The enzyme displayed high wax synthase (but no diacylglycerol acyltransferase) activity both in vivo and in vitro. In the presence of exogenous fatty alcohol, wax esters accounted for more than 57% of total yeast lipids. In vitro, MhWS2 produced wax esters with most of the tested substrates, showing the highest activity with 14:0-, 18:1-, 18:0-, 12:0-, and 16:0-CoA together with saturated C10-C16 fatty alcohols. Co-expression with genes encoding fatty acyl reductases resulted in the accumulation of C26-C36 wax esters. Altogether, our results provide a detailed characterization of MhWS2 which should be useful in the development of strategies for producing wax esters in various expression systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 24%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2018.
All research outputs
#21,608,038
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,994
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,941
of 335,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#126
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.