↓ Skip to main content

Long-acting medications for the hyperkinetic disorders

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-acting medications for the hyperkinetic disorders
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00787-007-0615-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Schlander

Abstract

New long-acting medications for attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have become available, which combine certain advantages over conventional short-acting drugs with higher acquisition costs. Choices between these drugs should thus be driven by their clinical profiles and by an acceptable balance of increased costs and additional benefits. Accordingly, the notion of relative cost-effectiveness should be central to recommendations about the use of these drugs in practice. A recent technology assessment on behalf of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) did not identify differences between compounds in terms of clinical efficacy and described drug cost as the major driver of cost-effectiveness. The underlying economic model was restricted to a cost-utility analysis that used only a fraction of the available clinical evidence base and did not address the distinction between efficacy and effectiveness. Cost-effectiveness evaluations including the potential impact of improved treatment compliance indicate a relatively more attractive cost-effectiveness of long-acting medications than suggested by the NICE assessment. These evaluations provide health economic support to treatment recommendations recently published by the European Network for Hyperkinetic Disorders. Limitations of currently available economic evaluations include their short time horizon, and future research should assess treatment effects on long-term sequelae associated with ADHD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Unspecified 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 9%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#798
of 1,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,086
of 76,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.