| Title |
Outcomes of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Solitary Renal Stones in the CROES URS Global Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Urology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Skolarikos, Andreas J. Gross, Alfred Krebs, Dogan Unal, Eduardo Bercowsky, Ehab Eltahawy, Bhaskar Somani, Jean de la Rosette |
| Abstract |
To determine the efficacy and safety of flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) for the treatment of single intrarenal calculi and further stratify the efficacy by stone burden. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 64% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,512,790
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#10
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,691
of 366,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.