↓ Skip to main content

The “Flashforward Procedure”: Confronting the Catastrophe

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of EMDR Practice & Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The “Flashforward Procedure”: Confronting the Catastrophe
Published in
Journal of EMDR Practice & Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1891/1933-3196.8.1.25
Authors

Robin David Julian Logie, Ad De Jongh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Lecturer 5 8%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 55%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of EMDR Practice & Research
#130
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,610
of 319,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of EMDR Practice & Research
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.