↓ Skip to main content

A latent ability to persist: differentiation in Toxoplasma gondii

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A latent ability to persist: differentiation in Toxoplasma gondii
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00018-018-2808-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Jeffers, Zoi Tampaki, Kami Kim, William J. Sullivan

Abstract

A critical factor in the transmission and pathogenesis of Toxoplasma gondii is the ability to convert from an acute disease-causing, proliferative stage (tachyzoite), to a chronic, dormant stage (bradyzoite). The conversion of the tachyzoite-containing parasitophorous vacuole membrane into the less permeable bradyzoite cyst wall allows the parasite to persist for years within the host to maximize transmissibility to both primary (felids) and secondary (virtually all other warm-blooded vertebrates) hosts. This review presents our current understanding of the latent stage, including the factors that are important in bradyzoite induction and maintenance. Also discussed are the recent studies that have begun to unravel the mechanisms behind stage switching.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 25%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Researcher 7 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 47 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 6%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 52 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,066,236
of 25,129,395 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#90
of 5,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,675
of 335,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,129,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.