You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Placode rotation in transitional lumbosacral lipomas: are there implications for origin and mechanism of deterioration?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Child's Nervous System, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00381-018-3782-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Jones, Dominic Thompson |
| Abstract |
Rotation of the lipoma-neural placode has been noted in transitional lumbosacral lipomas. The purpose of this study was to confirm this rotation; that this rotation occurs with a preference to the left, and correlates with clinical symptoms. In addition, this study tests the hypothesis that this rotation occurs through local mechanical forces rather than intrinsic congenital malformation. Lipomas were classified as per the Chapman classification. Degree of rotation of the placode from the coronal plane was recorded along with the presence of herniation outside of the vertebral canal. Abnormalities on urodynamic testing were recorded, along with neuro-orthopaedic signs picked up on formal neuro-physiotherapy assessment. Placode rotation occurs more frequently in the transitional group. Regardless of lipoma classification, rotation was much more common to the left. Furthermore, when lateralisation of symptoms was present, this strongly correlated with the direct of rotation. There was no difference in rotation of the placode whether it was within (lipomyelocoele) or without the vertebral canal (lipomyelomeningocoele). Placode rotation is a feature of transitional lumbosacral lipomas and may account for the increase in symptoms amongst this subgroup. Herniation of the placode outside the vertebral canal does not increase the risk of rotation suggesting a congenital cause for this finding rather than a purely mechanical explanation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 23% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,594,219
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,448
of 2,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,277
of 329,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#43
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.