↓ Skip to main content

Meta-analysis of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass versus drug-eluting stents for isolated left anterior descending coronary artery disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-analysis of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass versus drug-eluting stents for isolated left anterior descending coronary artery disease
Published in
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralf E. Harskamp, Judson B. Williams, Michael E. Halkos, Renato D. Lopes, Jan G.P. Tijssen, T. Bruce Ferguson, Robbert J. de Winter

Abstract

To compare the outcomes between minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MINI-CAB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for isolated left anterior descending artery disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#5,676
of 7,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,737
of 237,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#33
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,010 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.