↓ Skip to main content

A tractable Scheme implementation

Overview of attention for article published in Higher-Order & Symbolic Computation, December 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A tractable Scheme implementation
Published in
Higher-Order & Symbolic Computation, December 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01018614
Authors

Richard A. Kelsey, Jonathan A. Rees

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Master 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 83%
Mathematics 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 1997.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Higher-Order & Symbolic Computation
#16
of 58 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,003
of 76,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher-Order & Symbolic Computation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them