↓ Skip to main content

Design of the Jacky dragon visual display: signal and noise characteristics in a complex moving environment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design of the Jacky dragon visual display: signal and noise characteristics in a complex moving environment
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, May 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00359-003-0423-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. A. Peters, C. S. Evans

Abstract

Visual systems are typically selective in their response to movement. This attribute facilitates the identification of functionally important motion events. Here we show that the complex push-up display produced by male Jacky dragons ( Amphibolurus muricatus) is likely to have been shaped by an interaction between typical signalling conditions and the sensory properties of receivers. We use novel techniques to define the structure of the signal and of a range of typical moving backgrounds in terms of direction, speed, acceleration and sweep area. Results allow us to estimate the relative conspicuousness of each motor pattern in the stereotyped sequence of which displays are composed. The introductory tail-flick sweeps a large region of the visual field, is sustained for much longer than other components, and has velocity characteristics that ensure it will not be filtered in the same way as wind-blown vegetation. These findings are consistent with the idea that the tail-flick has an alerting function. Quantitative analyses of movement-based signals can hence provide insights into sensory processes, which should facilitate identification of the selective forces responsible for structure. Results will complement the detailed models now available to account for the design of static visual signals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 28%
Researcher 11 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 52%
Psychology 4 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#514
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,594
of 54,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.