↓ Skip to main content

Capturing Collaborative Challenges: Designing Complexity-Sensitive Theories of Change for Cross-Sector Partnerships

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
382 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Capturing Collaborative Challenges: Designing Complexity-Sensitive Theories of Change for Cross-Sector Partnerships
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rob van Tulder, Nienke Keen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 382 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 15%
Student > Master 53 14%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 8%
Student > Bachelor 20 5%
Other 58 15%
Unknown 134 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 99 26%
Social Sciences 51 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 3%
Environmental Science 10 3%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 146 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,339,615
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#594
of 3,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,124
of 330,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#15
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.