You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Diagnostic Methods for Asperger Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-008-0537-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristiina Kopra, Lennart von Wendt, Taina Nieminen-von Wendt, E. Juulia Paavonen |
| Abstract |
Several different diagnostic sets of criteria exist for Asperger syndrome (AS), but there is no agreement on a gold standard. The aim of this study was to compare four diagnostic sets of criteria for AS: the ICD-10, the DSM-IV, the Gillberg & Gillberg, and the Szatmari criteria. The series consists of 36 children who had been referred to two centers with a tentative diagnosis of AS. The best agreement was between the ICD-10 and the DSM-IV criteria (Kappa coefficient 0.48), and the lowest between the Gillberg & Gillberg and Szatmari criteria (Kappa coefficient -0.21). The poor agreement between these sets of diagnostic criteria compromises the comparability of studies on AS. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 17 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,861
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,383
of 81,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.