↓ Skip to main content

Remembering first impressions: Effects of intentionality and diagnosticity on subsequent memory

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Remembering first impressions: Effects of intentionality and diagnosticity on subsequent memory
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, December 2011
DOI 10.3758/s13415-011-0074-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roee Gilron, Angela H. Gutchess

Abstract

People rely on first impressions every day as an important tool to interpret social behavior. While research is beginning to reveal the neural underpinnings of first impressions, particularly through understanding the role of dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), little is known about the way in which first impressions are encoded into memory. This is surprising because first impressions are relevant from a social perspective for future interactions, requiring that they be transferred to memory. The present study used a subsequent-memory paradigm to test the conditions under which the dmPFC is implicated in the encoding of first impressions. We found that intentionally forming impressions engages the dmPFC more than does incidentally forming impressions, and that this engagement supports the encoding of remembered impressions. In addition, we found that diagnostic information, which more readily lends itself to forming trait impressions, engages the dmPFC more than does neutral information. These results indicate that the neural system subserving memory for impressions is sensitive to consciously formed impressions. The results also suggest a distinction between a social memory system and other explicit memory systems governed by the medial temporal lobes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 49%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,728,930
of 24,276,163 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#75
of 980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,982
of 248,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,276,163 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.