↓ Skip to main content

Social behavior and pheromonal communication in reptiles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social behavior and pheromonal communication in reptiles
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00359-010-0551-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert T. Mason, M. Rockwell Parker

Abstract

The role of pheromones in orchestrating social behaviors in reptiles is reviewed. Although all reptile orders are examined, the vast majority of the literature has dealt only with squamates, primarily snakes and lizards. The literature is surprisingly large, but most studies have explored relatively few behaviors. The evolution of chemical signaling in reptiles is discussed along with behaviors governed by pheromones including conspecific trailing, male-male agonistic interactions, sex recognition and sex pheromones, and reptilian predator recognition. Nonreptilian prey recognition by chemical cues was not reviewed. The recent literature has focused on two model systems where extensive chemical ecology studies have been conducted: the reproductive ecology of garter snakes and the behavioral ecology of Iberian lacertid lizards. In these two systems, enough is known about the chemical constituents that mediate behaviors to explore the evolution of chemical signaling mechanisms that affect life history patterns. In addition, these models illuminate natural and sexual selection processes which have lead to complex chemical signals whose different components and concentrations provide essential information about individuals to conspecifics. Reptiles provide excellent candidates for further studies in this regard not only in squamates, but also in the orders where little experimental work has been conducted to date.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Brazil 4 1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 321 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 87 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 17%
Student > Master 42 12%
Researcher 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 64 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 197 57%
Environmental Science 27 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 1%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 73 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#468
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,586
of 95,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.