You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prognostic profiles and the effectiveness of assisted conception: secondary analyses of individual patient data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Reproduction Update, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/humupd/dmt035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N.M. van den Boogaard, A.J. Bensdorp, K. Oude Rengerink, K. Barnhart, S. Bhattacharya, I.M. Custers, C. Coutifaris, A.J. Goverde, D.S. Guzick, E.C. Hughes, P. Factor-Litvak, P. Steures, P.G.A. Hompes, F. van der Veen, B.W.J. Mol, P. Bossuyt |
| Abstract |
At present, it is unclear which treatment strategy is best for couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility. We hypothesized that the prognostic profile influences the effectiveness of assisted conception. We addressed this issue by analysing individual patient data (IPD) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 27% |
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 61% |
| Psychology | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2013.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction Update
#685
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,576
of 225,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction Update
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.