| Title |
Evaluating conservation and fisheries management strategies by linking spatial prioritization software and ecosystem and fisheries modelling tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12404 |
| Authors |
Kristian Metcalfe, Sandrine Vaz, Georg H. Engelhard, Maria Ching Villanueva, Robert J. Smith, Steven Mackinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 22% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Sweden | 3 | 5% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Iceland | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 80% |
| Scientists | 9 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 63 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#527,655
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#313
of 3,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,467
of 262,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.