↓ Skip to main content

Stress is a bad advisor. Stress primes poor decision making in deluded psychotic patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stress is a bad advisor. Stress primes poor decision making in deluded psychotic patients
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00406-015-0585-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Moritz, Ulf Köther, Maike Hartmann, Tania M. Lincoln

Abstract

Stress is implicated in the onset of psychosis but the complex links between stress and psychotic breakdown are yet poorly understood. For the present study, we examined whether two prominent cognitive biases in psychosis, jumping to conclusions and distorted attribution, in conjunction with neuropsychological deficits play a role in this process. Thirty participants with schizophrenia and acute delusional symptoms were compared with 29 healthy controls across three conditions involving a noise stressor, a social stressor or no stressor. Under each condition participants had to perform parallel versions of cognitive bias tasks and neuropsychological tests including a probabilistic reasoning task (jumping to conclusions), the revised Internal, Personal and Situational Attributions Questionnaire (IPSAQ-R; attributional style), and the Corsi block-tapping task (nonverbal memory). Stress, particularly noise, aggravated performance differences of patients relative to controls on memory. Participants with psychosis demonstrated an escalated jumping to conclusion bias under stress. At a medium effect size, patients made more monocausal attributions, which increased under social stress. The present study is partially in line with prior studies. It suggests that stress negatively affects cognition in psychosis more than in controls, which is presumably insufficiently realized by patients and thus not held in check by greater response hesitance. Raising patients' awareness about these response tendencies and encouraging them to be more cautious in their judgments under conditions of increased stress may prove beneficial for improving positive symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,447,574
of 24,882,360 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#206
of 1,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,329
of 261,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,882,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.