You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? No
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5066-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sylvie Chevret, Niall D. Ferguson, Rinaldo Bellomo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 23 | 16% |
United States | 17 | 12% |
Australia | 9 | 6% |
Canada | 8 | 6% |
France | 4 | 3% |
Colombia | 4 | 3% |
Spain | 4 | 3% |
Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
Ecuador | 2 | 1% |
Other | 24 | 17% |
Unknown | 44 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 93 | 65% |
Scientists | 34 | 24% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 12 | 20% |
Researcher | 10 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
Psychology | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#466,224
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#408
of 5,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,060
of 324,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#12
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.