↓ Skip to main content

Development of a Brief Substance Use Sensation Seeking Scale: Validation and Prediction of Injection-Related Behaviors

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a Brief Substance Use Sensation Seeking Scale: Validation and Prediction of Injection-Related Behaviors
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10461-014-0875-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Werb, Chris Richardson, Jane Buxton, Jeannie Shoveller, Evan Wood, Thomas Kerr

Abstract

Sensation seeking, a personality trait, has been shown to predict engagement in high-risk behaviors. However, little is known regarding the impact of sensation seeking on substance use among street youth. We therefore sought to modify a sensation seeking scale (SSS) for use among this population. Street youth from the Vancouver-based At-Risk Youth Study (n = 226) completed the modified SSS. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA/CFA) were undertaken to establish the scale's dimensionality and internal validity. The association between SSS score and injection-related behaviors was tested using generalized estimating equation analysis. EFA results indicated scale unidimensionality. The comparative fit index (CFI) suggested acceptable fit (CFI = 0.914). In multivariate analysis, sensation seeking was independently associated with injection drug use, crystal methamphetamine use, polysubstance use, and binge drug use (all p < 0.05). Our findings provide preliminary support for the use of the modified SSS among street youth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 26%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 17 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Psychology 6 13%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,045,101
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,086
of 3,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,873
of 243,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#22
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.