You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Pilot Evaluation of Associations Between Displayed Depression References on Facebook and Self-reported Depression Using a Clinical Scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11414-011-9258-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan Andreas Moreno, Dimitri A. Christakis, Katie G. Egan, Lauren A. Jelenchick, Elizabeth Cox, Henry Young, Hope Villiard, Tara Becker |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study was to determine associations between displayed depression symptoms on Facebook and self-reported depression symptoms using a clinical screen. Public Facebook profiles of undergraduates from two universities were examined for displayed depression references. Profiles were categorized as depression symptom displayers or non-displayers. Participants completed an online PHQ-9 depression scale. Analyses examined associations between PHQ-9 score and depression symptom displayers versus non-displayers. The mean PHQ-9 score for non-displayers was 4.7 (SD = 4.0), the mean PHQ-9 score for depression symptom displayers was 6.4 (SD = 5.1; p = 0.018). A trend approaching significance was noted that participants who scored into a depression category by their PHQ-9 score were more likely to display depression symptom references. Displayed references to depression symptoms were associated with self-reported depression symptoms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Jordan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 40 | 20% |
| Unknown | 30 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 64 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,439,423
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#180
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,826
of 126,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them