↓ Skip to main content

Mislocalization of tactile stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mislocalization of tactile stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome
Published in
Journal of Neurology, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00415-006-0117-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ch. Maihöfner, B. Neundörfer, F. Birklein, H. O. Handwerker

Abstract

Complex-Regional-Pain-Syndromes (CRPS) are characterized by sensory,motor and autonomic dysfunctions. Patterns of sensory symptoms suggest changes within the central nervous system (CNS). Recently, we could show substantial reorganization of somatotopic maps within the central nervous system of patients with CRPS using functional imaging techniques (Maihofner et al. Neurology, 2003). These changes were predicted by CRPS pain and mechanical hyperalgesia. In the present study we looked for potential psychophysical correlates of cortical reorganization in CRPS. Sequential pneumatic non-noxious tactile stimulation was performed at digits 1 and 5 in 24 patients with CRPS of the upper extremities. Both the unaffected and affected side were examined. Patients were interviewed for tactile induced sensations. The occurrence of mislocalizations was correlated with a detailed psychophysical examination in which sensory, motor and autonomic symptoms were assessed. Eight patients (30 %) reported tactile mislocalizations, which were felt in the affected hand. In four cases the referred sensations spread into other nerve territories (ulnar/median nerve). Presence of mechanical hyperalgesia significantly predicted the occurrence of mislocalizations. In contrast, in a healthy control group, no mislocalizations were found. Thus, our results further support the concept of pain-induced reorganization in the somatosensory system of CRPS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Other 31 28%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 25%
Psychology 16 14%
Neuroscience 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2015.
All research outputs
#18,403,994
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,640
of 4,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,851
of 65,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#21
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.