↓ Skip to main content

Lacan’s subversion of the subject

Overview of attention for article published in Continental Philosophy Review, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lacan’s subversion of the subject
Published in
Continental Philosophy Review, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11007-006-9024-3
Authors

Ed Pluth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
United States 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Student > Master 3 21%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 8 57%
Philosophy 4 29%
Linguistics 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,327,280
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Continental Philosophy Review
#119
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,822
of 156,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Continental Philosophy Review
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.