↓ Skip to main content

A Seven-Year Study of Phenolic Concentrations of the Dioecious Salix myrsinifolia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Seven-Year Study of Phenolic Concentrations of the Dioecious Salix myrsinifolia
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10886-018-0942-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katri Nissinen, Virpi Virjamo, Lauri Mehtätalo, Anu Lavola, Anu Valtonen, Line Nybakken, Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto

Abstract

In boreal woody plants, concentrations of defensive phenolic compounds are expected to be at a high level during the juvenile phase and decrease in maturity, although there is variation between plant species. Females of dioecious species, like most of the Salicaceae, are expected to invest their resources in defense and reproduction, while males are expected to be more growth-oriented. We studied age- and sex-dependent changes in leaf and stem phenolics, and in height and diameter growth in a dioecious Salix myrsinifolia plants over a seven-year time period. In addition, we registered flowering as well as rust damage in the leaves. From the first year and throughout ontogenetic development from juvenile to adult phases, there was no significant change in the concentrations of any of the studied compounds in the leaves of S. myrsinifolia. In the stems, the concentrations of six out of 43 identified compounds decreased slightly with age, which may be partly explained by dilution caused by the increment in stem diameter with age. The fairly steady chemistry level over seven years, accompanied by moderate genotypic phenolic variation, indicates important roles of chemical defenses against herbivory for this early-successional species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 46%
Chemistry 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,481,952
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#1,886
of 2,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,503
of 332,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#27
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.