↓ Skip to main content

Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
21 blogs
policy
16 policy sources
twitter
299 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1378 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1439 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0906974107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J. Davis, Ken Caldeira

Abstract

CO(2) emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are the primary cause of global warming. Much attention has been focused on the CO(2) directly emitted by each country, but relatively little attention has been paid to the amount of emissions associated with the consumption of goods and services in each country. Consumption-based accounting of CO(2) emissions differs from traditional, production-based inventories because of imports and exports of goods and services that, either directly or indirectly, involve CO(2) emissions. Here, using the latest available data, we present a global consumption-based CO(2) emissions inventory and calculations of associated consumption-based energy and carbon intensities. We find that, in 2004, 23% of global CO(2) emissions, or 6.2 gigatonnes CO(2), were traded internationally, primarily as exports from China and other emerging markets to consumers in developed countries. In some wealthy countries, including Switzerland, Sweden, Austria, the United Kingdom, and France, >30% of consumption-based emissions were imported, with net imports to many Europeans of >4 tons CO(2) per person in 2004. Net import of emissions to the United States in the same year was somewhat less: 10.8% of total consumption-based emissions and 2.4 tons CO(2) per person. In contrast, 22.5% of the emissions produced in China in 2004 were exported, on net, to consumers elsewhere. Consumption-based accounting of CO(2) emissions demonstrates the potential for international carbon leakage. Sharing responsibility for emissions among producers and consumers could facilitate international agreement on global climate policy that is now hindered by concerns over the regional and historical inequity of emissions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 299 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 1%
United Kingdom 12 <1%
Sweden 7 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Other 15 1%
Unknown 1368 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 255 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 232 16%
Researcher 219 15%
Student > Bachelor 118 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 68 5%
Other 242 17%
Unknown 305 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 289 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 142 10%
Engineering 126 9%
Social Sciences 104 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 71 5%
Other 310 22%
Unknown 397 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 643. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#34,613
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#981
of 103,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58
of 103,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3
of 749 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 749 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.