↓ Skip to main content

Cervical Facet Injections in the Management of Cervicogenic Headaches

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pain and Headache Reports, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cervical Facet Injections in the Management of Cervicogenic Headaches
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11916-015-0484-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Ng, Dajie Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 21%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,267,098
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#735
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,530
of 262,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.